If so, we should expect women to use their superior social skills to cooperate among themselves and to outmanoeuvre and manipulate the aggressive and self-centered men. Consequently, it is often thought that women have better social skills than men, and in particular, that women are better at understanding the needs, desires and viewpoints of other people. If this is possible among elephants, why not among Homo sapiens? Women, just like female elephants, need to develop their social skills in order to get help in raising children, and they constantly need to see reality from the viewpoint of another person, their child. Elephant societies are consequently controlled by strong networks of cooperative females, while the self-centred and uncooperative males are pushed to the sidelines. Their social skills and social bonds remain underdeveloped. Males, meanwhile, spend their time fighting and competing. They construct all-female social networks that help each member raise her young.
THE ULTIMATE EXPERIENCE YUVAL NOAH HARARI HOW TO
Since female elephants need a lot of help in raising the young, they are obliged to develop their social skills and learn how to cooperate and appease.
But among other animals, such as elephants, the dynamics between dependent females and competitive males result in a matriarchal society. So muscle-power cannot explain male domination.Īnother common theory says that men have dominated women because women need a lot of help when they are pregnant or when they take care of young children, whereas men can devote themselves to aggressively competing for leadership roles. He is often an older man who very rarely uses his own fists he gets younger and fitter men to do the dirty jobs for him. Even in organised crime, the big boss is not necessarily the strongest man. Rather, you do so by building a broad coalition of supporters.
How do you become Prime Minister of India? Not by beating up all the other candidates.
0 kommentar(er)
